Installed some time in 1998. Latest update, 23 Nov 2009.
Added or changed material is in bold.
The following discussion is offered in contradistinction with the
standard model. Quarks and gluons are not considered.
In the EAS model of electrodynamics a neutron is comprised of a proton with a
"grazing orbit" nuclear electron. The electron is kept in orbit by the
impulses of inbound momentum-bearing positive and negative
chargelets coming in from the EAS-particle environment.
(This idea is related to that of Dudley's neutrino sea.) The nuclear
electron travels in short straight line segments between collision or
emission events. Each "centripetal" collision changes the direction of the
electron's path by a small amount so that overall the electron "skids" around
the proton. The nuclear electron's hypothetical average orbital
speed is approximately 0.91c. The kinetic energy associated
with this speed corresponds to the maximum value (0.78 MEV) of the neutron
Beta decay 's kinetic energy spectrum. (The 0.91c figure was arrived
at by illegally using relativistic considerations to explain
the equivalent of 1.51 electron masses increase in mass of a neutron
compared to the combined masses of a proton and an electron. The author
actually proposes a shielding function to account for what's called nuclear
mass excess. See EAS Mass Excess.)
The impinging collisions are considered to be stochastic. The binding
ability of the impinging flux will be proportional to the number of
centripetal impacts during any given portion of the electron's orbit. We
might expect, on average, 500 or more centripetal events per orbit, with the
orbit period being on the order of 10 exp -22 sec. If a sufficient temporal
lull in this impingement rate occurs, the electron will shoot off
tangentially, away from the proton, at its current linear velocity. (In this
model a proton and electron are not created in a beta decay event, they
simply part company. Anti-neutrinos, as beta decay products, are not
considered in the model.)
Here is an animated cross-section of an amplitude varying Coulomb barrier
postulated to result from the stochastic bombardment of a nucleus by
EAS particles. The animation includes a bombardment lull as
described in the previous paragraph. [Added 1-3 September 2005.]
Height Varying Coulomb Barrier
Readers are reminded that in the EAS model there are
no attractive forces. This includes the so-called nuclear strong
force. There is no quantum tunneling through what are thought to be
fixed height Coulomb barriers. Instead, when the height of some
fraction of a varying Coulomb barrier drops sufficiently (ever so
briefly), nucleons or electrons, etc., (with only modest kinetic energies)
can enter or exit the nuclear volume. This process would be akin to driving
through a (temporary) mountain pass in a low power car.) [Added 1-3
September 2005.]
For multiple nucleon systems the nuclear electrons interact in what is called
an attractive sense with "shared" protons in a manner which significantly
reduces the probability of electron escape, and the probability that the
protons will then part company. (This is pretty close to the visual picture of
protons playing "tug-or war with negatively charged virtual muons. The idea
needs more development.) Suffice it to say for now, that (using a Deuteron for
discussion's sake) whichever proton is entertaining the electron during a
given period of time, that proton-electron association would be
the neutron. If the electron were to be executing a figure-eight path around the
"pylon-like" protons, the proton-to-neutron switching period would be
on the order of 2 x 10exp-22 secs. This is not to infer that the path is
a figure-eight. It might be a bed-spring/slinky type spiral.
Magnetic studies of Deuterons should be able to shed light on the electron's
actual path. (The magnetic moment of a bedspring/slinky path would
be orders larger than that of a figure eight path.)
The so-called weak interaction for neutrons, might be
interpreted as evidence of the bombardment lulls occurring
at such a rate that, on average, half of the existing nuclear electrons,
within a population of free neutrons near the surface of the Earth,
escape every 10.5 minutes. [Modified 03 September 2005.]
. . .
The bombardment lulls might well play a catalytic role in so-called
cold fusion and/or other low energy nuclear transmutations.
[Added 03 September 2005.]